![]() |
présentation -
pourquoi/comment -
IRC -
débats infos du jour - infos par thèmes - liens - contributions |
![]() |
Miami: Les sans-logis remportent une victoire
Date: 13 Feb 1998
From: martin@laurentides.net
To: reseau@lists.nothingness.org
D'abord un avertissement à l'effet que plusieurs villes nord-américaines mandatent de plus en plus leurs policiers à s'en prendre aux sans-logis, aux "squeegee kids" et à d'autres exclus. Mais ensuite, une excellente nouvelle. Les sans-logis de Miami viennent de gagner une longue lutte contre l'administration municipale: de telles mesures leur nient leurs droits constitutionnels et le maire a casqué. Un pas en direction d'une reconnaissance de droits fondamentaux aux dépossédés? martin _____________ repiqué de la liste Citizens for Local Democracy ____________ >There has been considerable media attention on the so-called "international >conference on crime control", which is pushing the notion that police >departments should crackdown on homeless people, squeegee kids and others >as a way of reducing the community's crime rate. This offensive attack on >the poor has been done in a number of U.S. cities, such as New York, >Boston, and Atlanta; and the pressure is building on Toronto police to >bring in the same program here. > >It is interesting to note that the "broken window" campaign was vigourously >resisted in Miami and, at the end of last year, the Mayor of that city was >forced to sign a settlement in a legal action launched on behalf of 5,000 >homeless people. The settlement, among other things, calls on the police to >change their tactics in dealing with the homeless. > >Details are contained in the following press release from the American >Civil Liberties Union, which carried the case forward. > >---------------------- > >Miami Settles Homeless Lawsuit > >FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > >Thursday, December 18, 1997 > >MIAMI -- Mayor Xavier Suarez today signed a resolution approving a >settlement with the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida to end a >nine-year lawsuit filed on behalf of a class of 5,000 homeless persons who >charged that their civil rights were violated because of their homeless >status. > >The Settlement Agreement is the result of the collective efforts of ACLU >attorneys on behalf of the homeless plaintiffs, the City Attorneys' Office, >and numerous other community leaders, homeless activists and homeless >persons over the last two years. The >Agreement provides for: > > * Police training regarding the circumstances and rights of > homeless people. > * A protocol for law enforcement contracts with homeless > persons that ensures that people without shelter cannot be > arrested for merely living in public. > * The creation and maintenance of records regarding police > contacts with homeless persons. > * An advisory committee to monitor compliance with the > Agreement. > * A $600,000 compensation fund for homeless persons who were > injured by the unconstitutional conduct that was condemned > by the federal courts. > * Attorney fees for the plaintiffs' lawyers. > >The Agreement must still be approved by U.S. District Court Judge C. Clyde >Atkins after all affected plaintiffs have an opportunity to be heard. > >"This is a landmark settlement recognizing that homeless persons cannot be >denied fundamental constitutional rights simply because they are homeless," >said cooperating ACLU attorney Benjamin S. Waxman, who has worked on the >case for the past nine years. > >"The settlement reached today shows the best of what can be accomplished >when two sides of a dispute work together to find common ground to >accomplish a mutual goal, and may serve as a model for how other cities >treat the homeless," Waxman added. > >The lawsuit -- Pottinger v. City of Miami -- charged that the City's policy >was to arrest and harass involuntarily homeless residents of Miami, based >on little more than their public presence, for the purpose of driving them >out of the city or otherwise rendering them invisible. > >The case was tried in 1992 before the Honorable Federal District Judge C. >Clyde Atkins who found that the City of Miami's mistreatment of homeless >persons violated various provisions of the Bill of Rights and ordered that >the city establish two "safe zones" where homeless persons could congregate >and conduct essential, life-sustaining activities (sleeping, sitting, >standing, eating, etc.) without fear of arrest or police harassment. > >The City appealed the ruling to the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals >in Atlanta that sent the case back to Judge Atkins for a determination >whether, based on projects undertaken by the newly formed Dade County >Community Homeless Trust to assist homeless persons, circumstances had >changed to render the court's injunction unnecessary. > >Following another extensive hearing in 1994, Judge Atkins concluded that, >while the Homeless Trust's programs had certainly improved conditions for >homeless persons in Dade County, there were still involuntarily homeless >persons living on the streets who were being arrested based on nothing more >than their homeless status. > >The city appealed this ruling. This time the court referred the case to the >Eleventh Circuit Mediator and directed the parties attempt to negotiate a >settlement. > >© 1997, The American Civil Liberties Union > >Michael Shapcott >Toronto, Ontario, Canada >Tel. - 416-367-5402 >Fax. - 416-366-3876 > >| >|To subscribe: send mail to majordomo@list.web.net, no subject, with the >|following message (and no other text): subscribe c4ldemoc-l >
![]() |
présentation -
pourquoi/comment -
IRC -
débats infos du jour - infos par thèmes - liens - contributions |
![]() |